interface for a hardware trigger driver
Andre Haupt
andre at bitwigglers.org
Thu May 10 09:18:49 EDT 2012
Hi Philipp,
On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 02:52:11PM +0200, Philipp Ittershagen wrote:
> (resend, forgot CC)
>
> Hi Andre!
>
> On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 11:09:07AM +0200, Andre Haupt wrote:
> > Hi folks,
> >
> > Its been a while since i last did some kernel related stuff,
> > so please bear with me if this sounds strange to your ears.
> >
> > What i want to achieve:
> > I want to implement a hardware trigger that a user space process
> > can react on.
> >
> > I need a driver that blocks a process/thread until a sepcific
> > hardware interrupt occurs. The process should call a kernel
> > interface and then should get blocked until another
> > process/thread calls another kernel interface to stop waiting
> > for the irq or an interrupt actually occurs.
> >
> > What i have:
> > Back in the days i wrote a little character driver which implemented
> > 2 ioctl commands. One command (IOCTL_TRIGGER_WAIT_IRQ) put the
> > calling process to sleep using wait_evemt_interruptible() and
> > the other command (IOCTL_TRIGGER_STOP_WAIT_IRQ) woke a processes
> > again by calling wake_up_interruptible().
> >
> > Now ioctls are frowned upon and i do not want to mess with
> > majors and minors anymore either.
> >
> > Do you have any hints to the right approach for such a driver?
> > Should i use some sysfs interface? If yes, which? Or does
> > such a driver already exist? Can it be one completely in
> > user space?
>
> Why don't you use open(), write(), read() etc. to do the job?
>
> Tasks which should block can then do
>
> echo wait > /dev/yourdevname
>
> and another process can cancel the waiting by doing
>
> echo cancel > /dev/yourdevname
Or better, reading the device file blocks and returns the trigger status (none,
triggered, aborted) and writing to the device file wakes up the sleeping
processes.
So cat /dev/mydevice would block until an interrupt occurs or someone does
an echo foo > /dev/mydevice.
I vagely remember having done that in the first place. I cant remember
why i went with the ioctl stuff back then, though.
cheers,
Andre
More information about the Kernelnewbies
mailing list