which local FS supports concurrent direct IO write?

[Raghavendra D Prabhu]

Hi Zheng,

* On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 04:41:16PM -0500, Zheng Da <zhengda1936 at gmail.com> wrote:
>Hello,
>
>I'm looking for a FS in Linux that supports concurrent direct IO write.
>ext4 supports concurrent direct IO read if we mount it with dioread_nolock,
>but doesn't support concurrent writes. XFS doesn't support concurrent
>direct IO at all. It locks the inode exclusive if it's direct IO. I tried
>btrfs, and it seems it doesn't support concurrent direct IO either though I
>haven't looked into its code.
>Is there a local FS that support concurrent direct IO write? It seems NFS
>supports it (
>http://kevinclosson.wordpress.com/2011/08/12/file-systems-for-a-database-choose-one-that-couples-direct-io-and-concurrent-io-whats-this-have-to-do-with-nfs-harken-back-5-2-years-to-find-out/),
>but I'm looking for local FS.
>
>Thanks,
>Da

>_______________________________________________
>Kernelnewbies mailing list
>Kernelnewbies at kernelnewbies.org
>http://lists.kernelnewbies.org/mailman/listinfo/kernelnewbies

XFS locks inode exclusive only if it is an unaligned Direct 
IO, which is apparently done to prevent race conditions -- 
refer to this  http://oss.sgi.com/archives/xfs/2011-01/msg00157.html 
Also the behavior of Ext4 under dioread_nolock is supported 
by XFS by default and in a much better way. Also Ext4 is the only 
one which uses DIO_LOCKING while doing direct io.



Regards,
-- 
Raghavendra Prabhu
GPG Id : 0xD72BE977
Fingerprint: B93F EBCB 8E05 7039 CD3C A4B8 A616 DCA1 D72B E977
www: wnohang.net
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 490 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.kernelnewbies.org/pipermail/kernelnewbies/attachments/20120114/da6fb250/attachment.bin