linux hrtimer affinity
Vikram Narayanan
vikram186 at gmail.com
Sat Feb 18 13:04:09 EST 2012
Hello,
On 17-Feb-12 00:58:30, srimugunthan dhandapani wrote:
> Hi all
> As an experiment, i am trying to use softirq instead of using tasklet
> in my driver code.
Softirqs are meant for very critical processing. Why don't you reconsider?
> I was passing the driver's structure pointer to the tasklet.
Tasklet or softirq?
> The "open_softirq" takes only the function pointer as argument.
> Since we can't pass any argument to the softirq, is there any
> workaround that is possible to make the structure pointer accessible
> to softirq?
Anyways, you would've defined the softirq handler in your driver. right?
> I just need to do this for taking measurements.
Timestamps?
HTH,
Vikram
More information about the Kernelnewbies
mailing list