blktrace vs ftrace
Matthias Brugger
matthias.bgg at googlemail.com
Thu Feb 2 05:20:07 EST 2012
Hi all,
I'm trying to analize I/O behavior of Qemu on the host.
I used blktrace and the blk tracer for ftrace but I see different I/O
behavior.
I use 4 threads in the VM each reading sequentially a file. Readahead is
turned off. With blktrace reads are transmitted in a sequential way,
which means the next read will be executed when the first one has
completed. In comparison with ftrace, up to 4 reads are issued to the
disk in parallel.
I suppose the different behaviors are due to the overhead introduced by
the tracers.
My doubt is, which tracer has less influence on the I/O behaviour and
therefore reflects the system behaviour without tracing.
Thanks a lot,
Matthias
---
http://motzblog.wordpress.com/
More information about the Kernelnewbies
mailing list