[virtual memory] page_table_lock & mmap_sem
Venkatram Tummala
venkatram867 at gmail.com
Tue Mar 29 18:30:26 EDT 2011
Hi,
Why do we need both page_table_lock & mmap_sem in the kernel. Why isn't
mmap_sem good enough for serialization. As far as i see it, all attempts to
change the page table hierarchy in the kernel is done after holding the
write lock on mmap_sem. As we are already holding the write lock, we do we
need an extra page_table_lock (spinlock) ? Are there any code paths in the
kernel which attempt to modify the page table hierarchy without holding the
write lock on mmap_sem ?
page_table_lock is a finer grained lock than mmap_sem but page_table_lock is
only taken after holding a write lock on mmap_sem (as far as i can tell).
What is the reasoning behind having an extra spinlock?
Thanks.
Venkatram Tummala
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.kernelnewbies.org/pipermail/kernelnewbies/attachments/20110329/28620d70/attachment.html
More information about the Kernelnewbies
mailing list