Common signal handler system call

mohit verma mohit89mlnc at gmail.com
Fri Mar 18 17:12:26 EDT 2011


On Sat, Mar 19, 2011 at 2:00 AM, Manish Katiyar <mkatiyar at gmail.com> wrote:

> On Fri, Mar 18, 2011 at 1:11 PM, mohit verma <mohit89mlnc at gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > Hi  folks,
> > AFAIK there is not particular system call in Linux  systems that can
> > register a number of signals (signal numbers) at once and provide a
> common
> > signal handler for all of the assembled signals.
>
> Did you try giving a common signal handler for two different signals ?
>
Yes i did.

>
> > I know doing this may be
> > hardly required in practice.
>
> Why not....for example... I want to print "quitting...." error msg if
> I get SIGINT or SIGQUIT.
>

Ok. i think these messages are for debugging purpose. But anyway let  it be
common. :)

>
>
> > But i think this type of system call should be
> > in Linux systems which can serve handler functionality on some of
> signals.
> > Please tell me the flaws proposing something like this. i want to work on
> > this tiny problem. :)
> > --
> > ........................
> > MOHIT VERMA
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > ........................
> > MOHIT VERMA
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Kernelnewbies mailing list
> > Kernelnewbies at kernelnewbies.org
> > http://lists.kernelnewbies.org/mailman/listinfo/kernelnewbies
> >
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Thanks -
> Manish
>



-- 
........................
*MOHIT VERMA*
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.kernelnewbies.org/pipermail/kernelnewbies/attachments/20110319/4f887c4c/attachment-0003.html 


More information about the Kernelnewbies mailing list