Permanent Delivery Failure
Srdjan Todorovic
todorovic.s at googlemail.com
Thu Feb 10 13:52:29 EST 2011
On 10 February 2011 06:12, mohit verma <mohit89mlnc at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: MDaemon at fibcom.com <MDaemon at fibcom.com>
> Date: Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 11:31 AM
> Subject: Permanent Delivery Failure
> To: mohit89mlnc at gmail.com
>
>
> The attached message had PERMANENT fatal delivery errors!
I had this bounce before, and emailed the kernelnewbies-owner, but I
dont think I had a response yet.
Not sure if anyone is working on this problem...
Regards,
Srdjan
> After one or more unsuccessful delivery attempts the attached message has
> been removed from the mail queue on this server. The number and frequency
> of delivery attempts are determined by local configuration parameters.
>
> YOUR MESSAGE WAS NOT DELIVERED TO ANY OF IT'S RECIPIENTS!
>
> --- Session Transcript ---
> Thu 2011-02-10 11:31:36: Parsing message
> <xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx\pd50001467261.msg>
> Thu 2011-02-10 11:31:36: * From: mohit89mlnc at gmail.com
> Thu 2011-02-10 11:31:36: * To: amit at fibcom.com
> Thu 2011-02-10 11:31:36: * Subject: module prob
> Thu 2011-02-10 11:31:36: * Message-ID:
> <AANLkTi=TTnOfZubXZARJByf8n82r4pXp1shg1j-JsfZR at mail.gmail.com>
> Thu 2011-02-10 11:31:36: * Route slip host: 202.71.129.104
> Thu 2011-02-10 11:31:36: * Route slip port: 25
> Thu 2011-02-10 11:31:36: Attempting SMTP connection to [202.71.129.104]
> Thu 2011-02-10 11:31:36: Attempting to send message to smart host
> Thu 2011-02-10 11:31:36: Attempting SMTP connection to [202.71.129.104:25]
> Thu 2011-02-10 11:31:36: Waiting for socket connection...
> Thu 2011-02-10 11:31:36: * Connection established (192.5.1.2:2559 ->
> 202.71.129.104:25)
> Thu 2011-02-10 11:31:36: Waiting for protocol to start...
> Thu 2011-02-10 11:31:36: <-- 220 smtp ready smtp.bizmail.net4india.com
> Thu 2011-02-10 11:31:36: --> EHLO fibcom.com
> Thu 2011-02-10 11:31:36: <-- 250-smtp.bizmail.net4india.com Hello
> fibcom.com [203.101.81.201]
> Thu 2011-02-10 11:31:36: <-- 250-SIZE 57671680
> Thu 2011-02-10 11:31:36: <-- 250-PIPELINING
> Thu 2011-02-10 11:31:36: <-- 250 HELP
> Thu 2011-02-10 11:31:36: --> MAIL From:<mohit89mlnc at gmail.com> SIZE=15160
> Thu 2011-02-10 11:31:36: <-- 250 OK
> Thu 2011-02-10 11:31:36: --> RCPT To:<amit at fibcom.com>
> Thu 2011-02-10 11:31:36: <-- 550 relay not permitted
> --- End Transcript ---
(snip)
> Thank you.
>
> Fibcom India Limited
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: mohit verma <mohit89mlnc at gmail.com>
> To: kernelnewbies at kernelnewbies.org, kernelnewbies
> <kernelnewbies at nl.linux.org>
> Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2011 11:31:32 +0530
> Subject: module prob
> hi all,
> i have written a tiny module . when i install this one i check in dmesg and
> /proc/kallsyms.
> these files shows that the module is currently running . but when i go for
> "ohm_inode_permission" kernel security function in /proc/kallsyms it does
> not show that security operation but
> that must be registered along with the registration of module.
> i 've attached the source code along with........
>
> i think the problem is while registering the security function
> ohm_inode_permission (IMHO). but..................
> can someone tell me where am i wrong?
More information about the Kernelnewbies
mailing list