Low on disk space after compiling new kernel.

[Dexter Haslem]

On 12/20/2010 2:15 AM, Rishi Agrawal wrote:
>
> Thanks a ton ... I will try it.
>
>
> On Mon, Dec 20, 2010 at 2:15 PM, Mulyadi Santosa
> <mulyadi.santosa at gmail.com <mailto:mulyadi.santosa at gmail.com>> wrote:
>
>     Hi Rishi....
>
>     On Mon, Dec 20, 2010 at 13:48, Rishi Agrawal
>     <rishi.b.agrawal at gmail.com <mailto:rishi.b.agrawal at gmail.com>> wrote:
>      > Hi All,
>      >
>      > I installed the kernel 2.6.36 into my Fedora 12 system.
>      >
>      > I am now low on disk space.
>      >
>      > [root at rishi-desktop kernels]# du -sh linux-2.6.36/
>      > 4.4G    linux-2.6.36/
>
>     Hm, I think that's rather big....here after compilation (of course, my
>     .config is likely different than yours), 2.6.36 takes approximately
>     1.7 GiB
>      >
>      > It shows that the new compiled kernel is taking around 4.4GB.
>
>     Together with the object files during linking stage, I believe :)
>
>      > I wanted to free some of the space occupied by the compiled code. I
>      > understand that the /lib/modules/2.6.36 directory can't be
>     deleted as it
>      > contains the compiled modules.
>
>     Yup...
>
>      > I wanted to delete the files in /usr/src/kernel/2.6.36, without
>     effecting my
>      > newly installed kernel.
>      >
>      > -> Can I delete them?
>
>     AFAIK, /lib/modules/<version>/build is symlink-ed to that source code
>     dir, so IMHO don't delete it..
>
>      > -> What is the best way to delete them, I want to keep the source
>     files?
>
>     I think the best way here is to do "make clean" and then followed by
>     "make modules_prepare". That way, your kernel source dir is build with
>     files enough to compile external modules whenever needed, but not too
>     bloated
>
>     --
>     regards,
>
>     Mulyadi Santosa
>     Freelance Linux trainer and consultant
>
>     blog: the-hydra.blogspot.com <http://the-hydra.blogspot.com>
>     training: mulyaditraining.blogspot.com
>     <http://mulyaditraining.blogspot.com>
>
>
>
>
> --
> Regards,
> Rishi Agrawal
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Kernelnewbies mailing list
> Kernelnewbies at kernelnewbies.org
> http://lists.kernelnewbies.org/mailman/listinfo/kernelnewbies

Hi Rishi,

One other thing that might help is not compiling a debug build if you 
dont need it. Debug objects are much bigger of course. If you're ending 
up at 4.4GB it sounds like a build with debugging on.

-- 
-Dexter Haslem