From matt at domsch.com Tue Sep 14 00:22:49 2021 From: matt at domsch.com (Matt Domsch) Date: Mon, 13 Sep 2021 23:22:49 -0500 Subject: SDR++ package review request In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: SDR++ is a nice panadapter display with signal decoding, similar to CubicSDR. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2003876 is the review ticket for SDR++ https://github.com/AlexandreRouma/SDRPlusPlus . https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=75641411 has a rawhide scratch-build. https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=75641416 has a Fedora 34 scratch build. Thanks, Matt N5MLD -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From nr0q at gridtracker.org Wed Sep 22 12:10:28 2021 From: nr0q at gridtracker.org (Matthew Chambers) Date: Wed, 22 Sep 2021 11:10:28 -0500 Subject: New to the group Message-ID: <9b24b499-9dec-ad21-4e1a-3e81e9f2fc68@gridtracker.org> Hi I'm new to this email group and am wanting to look at including a ham radio software program that our team is working on in future versions of Fedora (and eventually other RHEL based distros). What I'm not finding easily is what the actual requirements to have software included in the Fedora repos? The program in question is GridTracker (licensed under the BSD 3-Clause license) with source code and RPM files available. Thanks and 73 Matthew Chambers NR0Q Dev Ops - GridTracker Server Ops - Off Air Message Service https://gridtracker.org https://gitlab.com/gridtracker.org/gridtracker From matt at domsch.com Thu Sep 23 23:12:05 2021 From: matt at domsch.com (Matt Domsch) Date: Thu, 23 Sep 2021 22:12:05 -0500 Subject: SDR++ package review request In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: sdrpp is now in Fedora 34 and 35 testing, and rawhide. Please give it a spin and report success or problems. Supported hardware includes rtlsdr and hackrf natively, plus anything soapy supports (soapy-uhd in the main repos; soapy-airspy in copr:copr.fedorainfracloud.org:doug1:SoapySDR). Special thanks to Petr Men??k for performing the package review. Thanks, Matt Thanks, Matt On Mon, Sep 13, 2021 at 11:22 PM Matt Domsch wrote: > SDR++ is a nice panadapter display with signal decoding, similar to > CubicSDR. > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2003876 > is the review ticket for SDR++ > https://github.com/AlexandreRouma/SDRPlusPlus. > > https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=75641411 > has a rawhide scratch-build. > > https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=75641416 > has a Fedora 34 scratch build. > > Thanks, > Matt N5MLD > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From matt at domsch.com Thu Sep 23 23:19:47 2021 From: matt at domsch.com (Matt Domsch) Date: Thu, 23 Sep 2021 22:19:47 -0500 Subject: New to the group In-Reply-To: <9b24b499-9dec-ad21-4e1a-3e81e9f2fc68@gridtracker.org> References: <9b24b499-9dec-ad21-4e1a-3e81e9f2fc68@gridtracker.org> Message-ID: On Wed, Sep 22, 2021 at 11:10 AM Matthew Chambers wrote: > Hi > > I'm new to this email group and am wanting to look at including a ham > radio software program that our team is working on in future versions of > Fedora (and eventually other RHEL based distros). > Welcome! > What I'm not finding easily is what the actual requirements to have > software included in the Fedora repos? > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/ and links there are a great place to get started. If you've not packaged anything before, you'll need to follow the process and obtain a sponsor as well. > The program in question is GridTracker (licensed under the BSD 3-Clause > license) with source code and RPM files available. > The spec files in the upstream will need a bit of cleanup work to meet the packaging guidelines reference in the link above.. The Makefile for installation is pretty light so the spec file is having to do a good bit more than typical 'make install'. Thanks, Matt -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From nr0q at gridtracker.org Tue Sep 28 14:53:44 2021 From: nr0q at gridtracker.org (Matthew Chambers) Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2021 13:53:44 -0500 Subject: New to the group In-Reply-To: References: <9b24b499-9dec-ad21-4e1a-3e81e9f2fc68@gridtracker.org> Message-ID: <6c3320c3-5c59-8387-3044-f79b0f2cc18d@gridtracker.org> I'd be open to any advice how we can make our build system work a bit better. I was not able to find any examples of RPM spec files for NWJS based applications in which there really isn't anything to compile but rather just pulling in the artifacts from the NWJS-Phoenix-Builder and telling RPM where everything should live on the user system. If there are any sponsors interested, particularly anyone that has the time to help us with the build system and produce all the needed packages that would be needed by Fedora and downstream systems. On 9/23/21 10:19 PM, Matt Domsch wrote: > On Wed, Sep 22, 2021 at 11:10 AM Matthew Chambers > > wrote: > > Hi > > I'm new to this email group and am wanting to look at including a ham > radio software program that our team is working on in future > versions of > Fedora (and eventually other RHEL based distros). > > > Welcome! > > What I'm not finding easily is what the actual requirements to have > software included in the Fedora repos? > > > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/ > and links > there are a great place to get started.? If you've not packaged > anything before, you'll need to follow the process and obtain a > sponsor?as well. > > The program in question is GridTracker (licensed under the BSD > 3-Clause > license) with source code and RPM files available. > > > The spec files in the upstream will need a bit of cleanup work to?meet > the packaging guidelines reference in the link above.. The Makefile > for installation is pretty light so the spec file is having to do a > good bit more than typical 'make install'. > > Thanks, > Matt > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: